Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Melania Trump Lays Bare The Hypocrisy Towards FLOTUS

This may come as a surprise, but i don't care about Melania Trump. I care for her in a human sense: I don't wish her ill, I do wish her happiness. Basically the same level of care I wish for everyone, including the people her husband is killing and harming, directly and indirectly.
Bess Truman had to follow in the steps of Eleanor Roosevelt. She hated everything about it. She did what was expected, but no more. She didn't live at the White House for most of the year. I don't know what headaches that caused for security, but again I don't care. If we get that het up about it, I suppose her husband will just continue grifting the money out of his supporters for private security.

Her lawsuit against the Daily Mail contends that she's losing money or has lost an opportunity to make money from product endorsements. Describing her as "the most photographed woman in the world" may be a bit much, but it clearly indicates that she will be using her body and what we want to say about it to make money.

And that's what really has a lot of people mad. Not that she's using her dog or talking about a foster grandchild, but that she's explicitly using her body.

Melania Trump might be the only honest entrepreneur in the family. She's actually had to work for a living, and she apparently wants to continue working. Okay. ╮ (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭

It's not like we pay FLOTUS. This "position" isn't paid, isn't in the Constitution, and really isn't up to us.

I can think of one bright, shining light out of this entire cock up: we women are free. The First Lady has posed in the nude and nobody cares. Every single slut shaming, beauty/ugly bashing comment about womens' bodies is now invalid in every particular.

"Why are you wearing that!?" Point to FLOTUS. "You have too much/little $thing showing" Point to FLOTUS.

"Beyoncé-"
(。_°☆\(- – )
"Michelle Ob-"
ヽ(#゚Д゚)ノ┌┛Σ(ノ´Д`)ノ
Point to FLOTUS.

FREE AT LAST. FREE AT LAST.

_________
Addendum here. The report in contention is that MT worked as an escort, or sex worker. There is no reason this should impugn her character, but we have a long way to go. If we could all let go of that particular predjudice, the lives and livelihood of sex workers could be much improved.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

We Are All Adam Lanza's Mother

Originally published on Google+

Charlotte Bacon

My parents brought us up without guns.  They absolutely hate handguns.  There was a time when I was tiny, that my mother hid with me in a closet while my father talked down a man who had run into our yard and house with a gun, on the run from the police.   They only spoke of it once, and from their demeanor, I decided I shouldn't press them for details.

Rachel D'Avino

They certainly weren't unfamiliar with guns.  My mother grew up on a farm, where a rifle is a tool, used for protection from predators and a source of food.  My father would routinely go out into the desert with uncles and cousins to cut wood for sale (mesquite roots and yucca).  They'd hunt rabbits by running them down and killing them with knives.  The rifle would be carried by an uncle and only used for protection.  Dad's mother had a rifle in her closet, unloaded, that she'd occasionally use to intimidate the thug wannabe's that would sometimes be lurking around her backyard in the middle of the city.

Olivia Engel

One thing that was always pressed home was that guns are for killing, nothing else.  Whether it's called "protection", "hunting", or a "show of strength", guns are  made for killing.  They could even kill you if you were stupid, cleaning it wrong, carrying it wrong, or treating it like a toy.  I have at least three relatives and almost a half dozen extended acquaintances who have died accidental gun deaths.  Some were responsible, some weren't.

Dylan Hockley

My first close encounter with a handgun was in a packed car of teenagers driving through Chihuahua to an orphanage for charity work.  The girls were jittery and laughing and someone said, "why aren't you afraid to drive around here so fast?".  The girl driving calmly opened the glove compartment and pulled out her handgun.  She held it properly, away from everyone, but showed it clearly.  It went back into the glove compartment and everyone shut up and listened to the music.

Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung

I've got friends who have taught their kids to shoot.  I've only shot practice rifles.  We don't have guns at home, though we're considering getting educated on them.  I'm not afraid of criminals with guns as much as I'm afraid of gun nuts "enthusiasts".

Jesse Lewis

There's something eerily similar about the attitude of the gunman's mother and the attitude of the enthusiasts and their sympathizers.  The boy could only be calmed by his mother, but others saw him as violent and dangerous.  Gun enthusiasts strike me as "calmed" when they have their security blanket (stockpiles) secured.  They are especially calmed when even the slightest hint of mental problems are cited as a factor in any shooting, whether there are two or twenty victims.  Ah, they chorus, there's nothing that could have been done.  We are absolved.

Ana Marquez-Greene

AND THE REST OF US DO THE SAME

Grace McDonnell

The story about the frog jumping out of hot water but staying for the slowly heating water is a myth, but the human tendency to think that things aren't so bad until they are is absolutely true.  How long should a mother wait to see if her child will "grow out of it"?  How many times should a father have to restrain his child until he's too big or too heavily armed?  How many times do you need to be told by an administrator that your child can't be in the same room as the other kids because of the frequent outbursts?

Anne Marie Murphy

The answer is sometimes not enough; the answer is sometimes not soon enough; the answer is sometimes schools would rather exclude than try to heal.  The answer is that some parents would rather withdraw and "take care of it themselves" rather than seek professional help.  The answer is that there is, many times NO FUCKING HELP.  Blame and tame isn't a catchphrase, but it might as well be.  Prison, or better, death, for the offender, blame for the parents.  Dust off our hands and call it handled.  Certainly we would never let that happen in our family.

Emilie Parker

And another answer is, there is a reward for "going nuts".  We literally have high-scorers listed on the news and Wikipedia, right there for our consumption.  We entertain ourselves with high body counts in movies and television shows.  The Transformers franchise alone has a higher body count than the current set of wars, though the people die much more cleanly; turning to red dust and thoughtfully leaving their clothes behind.

Noah Ponzer

How many people need to die before we all understand that the answer isn't more guns or less guns or more enforcement of laws that either do or don't exist?  How many times will we justify our already firm positions with fucking ridiculous claims about schools and God and morals that have nothing to do with what's going on?

Jessica Rekos

How long will we deny that there are families right now that need help raising their kids - even families that aren't dealing with a medical mental illness are struggling.  Those are real problems. Problems that aren't solved by calling the "opposition" crazed or fascist or socialist.  They aren't the opposition. They are your neighbors.  Teacher, who is my neighbor?

Lauren Rousseau

How long will we deny that it's impossible to gather up all the guns and thus ensure peace in our time?  How long will we claim that there's absolutely nothing wrong with stockpiling bunkers full of guns and ammo in fear of "the government" which absolutely has more firepower than you could dream of having?

Mary Sherlach

This is not a gun control problem alone.  This is not a mental health problem alone.  This is not a problem of not enough or too much religion.  This is not a problem of the failure of laws or the failure of a mental health "system".  This is a failure of all of us.

Victoria Soto

One time on vacation, I had a horrible time controlling my children in a grocery store.  A man in a camouflage cap burst out, saying, "These are the worst behaved children I've ever seen!"  Angry myself, I replied, "I try" and dragged them out of the store.  I would have done it without purchasing anything, but I had to get this errand done.

Daniel Barden

Other times I've been helped by people around me, whether it was to nudge them back into place, a neighbor offering me some time alone, or a friend listening to my anguish on the phone for an hour or two.

Josephine Gay

And sometimes it was a friend or professional saying, "this isn't normal, this requires more than what you've been doing.  This is the number of a support group, and here's someone who can help you take care of yourself."

Madeleine Hsu

The blame lies not in our stars, but in ourselves.  The taming is harder, but must, must, must come from us, working together.

Catherine Hubbard

Lone gunmen don't appear in a vacuum.  They come from us.

Chase Kowalski
James Mattoli
Jack Pinto
Caroline Prevdi
Avielle Richman
Benjamin Wheeler
Allison Wyatt

Nancy Lanza


Adam Lanza


Thursday, June 28, 2012

*clears throat*

Again, you're welcome.

We've been arguing over Federalism since we started.  This isn't the beginning of the ending of anything.  It's what we do. 

Saturday, June 9, 2012

We need a new term, so here it is: RAGE attack

I was reading an article on gay bashing in high schools, and had a flashback so hard it was nuts.  It felt so much like a panic attack, but there was nothing to panic about.

I took an anxiety pill anyway, and allowed the memory back.  In short, there was a point in middle school where just about every boy in 6th and/or 7th grade decided I was fair game for what I can only describe as "rude construction worker" - as in, even construction workers don't yell out your name and lift up their shirts and prance at you.  They'd chant my name, sometimes in unison, and try to get my attention.  It wasn't so much premeditated as flash-mobby.  I had no idea what they were on about, so I'd look at them and then away, and go about my business.  It was impossible to ignore, but at the same time I knew from my time being bullied, and, well, being a bully, that getting bent out shape or complaining wasn't going to do anything.  There were certain teachers who's classrooms they wouldn't dare try it in or around, but the good ones can't be everywhere.

It would happen in the halls, or recess, or at lunch, but one day it happened in the gym, during PE.  We'd all changed into our shorts and tshirts. The boys were in the bleachers, stacked up to be ready to go outside.  The girls were getting stacked up in the bleachers on the other side of the gym, to be ready for whatever we were going to do inside the gym.

When I came out of the changing room there was a deafening roar.  Every damned one of those boys went fucking nuts. Technically they all stayed seated in the bleacher area, but it was like some crazy burlesque, all of them clamoring for attention.  I stared at them, puzzled for a few seconds, then shook my head and went to the bleachers.

I don't remember what my feelings were at the time.  I've blocked so much of my life out, and I'd really rather it stayed blocked, thanks. But one thing I remember now, and that's where the RAGE came from.  The Coach.  He just fucking stood there and smiled his amusement.  I don't remember what the girls were doing. I think some of them were laughing at the spectacle at the boys and not necessarily at me. (I'm sure some of them were, but what else was new?)  I knew the girls' coach didn't care - she hated my family, so I deserved whatever I got.

But the coach.  Goddammit.  It might have been all of a minute.  But it's stayed with me, apparently.  The article mentions kids who had all the home support they could ask for, and still tried to (and sometimes did) kill themselves.

I do feel a little like the one girl who made it through.  She's not the happy trippy kid she was.  There's a shell that I recognize, and that I try to project myself.  I know, goddamn, I know.

Slime like Barb Anderson* are in the midst of their own gay-panic.  Panic that takei will be "normal".  Panic that their perceived control over America will be over once takei take over.  Panic that people like her will be a minority, and they know exactly how minorities are treated and don't want to be in that position.  So instead of fighting for the rights of minorities, Slime like Barb Anderson and her PALs are fighting to keep the "abnormals" in their place, because dog knows you don't want to fall down from such a high perch.

Trouble is, you can't keep people down without staying down there with them.


________________________________
*Oh, yes, I will call you slime, for thinking you can just force everyone to conform to your twisted version of the bible. I will call you slime for lying about what it is to be gay.  I will call you slime for even implying that ANYONE deserves to be bullied.  I'm already laughing at you composing an email telling me you're "hurt" and "offended" by me.  That you feel "bullied".  You don't know from bullied.  It's what people with power do to people without power, who have no recourse but to take it. All you have to do is close the browser window.

Monday, May 14, 2012

My A-Biden Love: my man Joe slips Obama a Thunderstone

Well!  In a year that's mostly been too boring for words, we finally have our only president telling us what we already knew and what he should have said anyway, anybody ought to be able to marry the man or woman they love: same, opposite, whatever. 

I've got the White House in my Google Plus stream (oh, don't hate, it's a nice place) so I'd seen it go by. Yay!  About time.

Since it's, you know, sensible, I didn't think to question why now except to note that something about the Republicans was finally winding down.  It'd be a safe bet, and it would get lost in you know, the fact that it's obvious and we're busy trying to get the economy back on line and end our stupid little wars.  You know, grown up stuff.

And honestly, I think I'm right. All I saw from my neo-con buddies was the same old LIBAERALS BAD.  Nothing about Obama except the professional Big C conservatives (Hi, Mark! How's business?)  who make money separating the fools from their money in the form of bumper stickers and daily affirmations.

I'm sorry to have to break it to you, regressives, but you're on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of demographics, and the wrong side of wrong.  The younger Repubs just don't care, and the ones with the money can see that, so they're not pushing it that hard.

So really, no big deal. Until I hear that some folks are trying to resuscitate that dead horse, the "Joe Biden gaffe".   One fellow goes so far as to demand, DEMAND that Joe be replaced by da Hilz*

Oh, the humanity. Seriously people, grow up.

Every four years we get the Worst VP Candidate Ever. There is no good selection "process".  We'd almost do better to go back to the Original Concept and just take whoever comes in second for prez in the Electoral College.
______________________________________________________
*Yeah, I'm gonna totally call her that, she's earned a nickname.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Don't Prosletyze, Don't Tell

Let me ask you this, chaplains who are worried you can't preach against homosexuality: when you wrote the Pentagon and President asking to retain Don't Ask Don't Tell, did you stop to think that you were asking people to keep on breaking the Eighth Commandment?

When you sign up, you're told up front that you're going to be in an ecumenical environment.  How is that changing?

Is the problem you won't be able to run amok with your particularly extreme views?  That you won't be able to keep Christianizing the military under the radar?

You do remember Matthew 24:45, yes?  Good, me too.

So Nancy up, my fellow ordained.  Get on your knees, ask for forgiveness, and do your duty.

Monday, November 1, 2010

The world is not going to end tomorrow

But I will say I have more faith in the energy of the young than the anger of the old.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Burn This Post

You give a thing power by your actions and beliefs.  This is true if you revere or revile something.

Words are immortal, books are not.

Free speech isn't free.  The work of not tolerating intolerance starts here, with everyone using their freedom of speech to condemn the Holy Book fetishists of all stripes: those who revere them to the point of madness, and those who revile them to the point of madness.

So burn your Quarans, burn your American flags, burn your tax bills, whatever.  Just remember that you are locking your own chains.  You are building your own prison.  While the rest of us move toward a more perfect union, you're the one who's stuck where you are, angry at an inanimate object that has only harmed you in your imagination.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

I suppose there's a 'logic' to it

If you call "abject fear of the Other" logic.

So the SCOTUS has ruled that peacemaking efforts aid and abet terrorism.  This isn't hyperbole.

The US Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutionality of a federal law that makes it illegal to teach members of a foreign terrorist group how to use peaceful means to pursue political goals. Source
So that's how we're gong to win the war on (Some) Terror: make it so we have no choice but to be war like, and keep the cycle going.

So.  What to do?  Imagine the spectacle of peace group members languishing in jail.  Can you see former President Carter writing letters from a jail thanks to the "Patriot" Act?  He pays the fine and gets out and does it again?  Or does he get a pardon?  Can he get one in advance?

Or we could, you know, just Nancy up and behave like grown ups.  We could try mediation.

It's worked before, in Ireland and South Africa.  South Africa doesn't have oil, but it does have gold.  I don't know what Ireland has, except proximity to England, a minor global power.

It's a basic tenet of terrorism and anti-terrorism - if someone has nothing left to lose, they are capable of abhorrent acts.  If we make sure they have nothing left to lose, we're inviting blowback.

This is not "blame America first". This is logic.  This is rational self-interest.  This is looking at what is and not what I want to see.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Joe, I am dissapoint

Yeah, it's a sour meme, but I'm in a sour mood.  Biden kicked off our country's support of Israel's killing of people in the middle of the night, and is resisting calls for an independent investigation.

Israel didn't have to sneak up in the middle of the night.  It could have acted in its own waters, in daylight, and simply turned them away.

Instead they attacked in international waters, in the dead of night, and started killing people "armed" with pepper spray.

It will be interesting if more boats start coming.  What will Israel do?  Keep killing?  Will we keep supporting it? How many people will have to die before there will be peace with justice?

Friday, May 21, 2010

Bonjour, Y'all!

Well, now, this is the day we find out if Texas is turning into France - arrogant without a lot of muscle to back it up, going our own way because, doggonit, we know we're in the right, and not giving a flip about what anybody else thinks.

Not that we didn't have these characteristics before.  What's new is that our influence is probably going to start going downhill, starting with the Texas influence on the nation's school textbooks.

We vote today on whitewashing, quite literally, Texas and U.S. History.  We're also voting on how much to indoctrinate our children in American Exceptionalism, which usually translates that everyone has to follow the major rules of decency, except for Americans.

California, that other hugely populous state, is considering blocking the revisions altogether, though it may not be necessary.  They won't be buying any new textbooks until 2013.  Who knows, we may have a whole different board or system by then.

So this is where we need to start.  We've had elections for some of the board members, now we need to "pack" the rest of the board with, you know, people who aren't so much into starting out with the answers to stuff into childrens' heads.

Our biggest mistake over the last few decades is the growth of the notion that schools must be run like businesses.  The product is "educated employees", which has translated to "cogs in the machine", not trained to question, in fact trained not to question.  It's translated to ridiculous "zero tolerance" rules that teach fear and that you're not safe unless you fit into this little pigeonhole, conveniently locker-sized.  Our universities are changing from places of inquiry to research mills for industry, and very high-priced vocational schools.

There's training, which is critical, and there is education, which is even more critical:  you get context, history, depth, and exposure to more than what you've seen before when you get an education.  With training, you're taught only what you need to know - actually what someone else has determined that you need to know.

What I see of today's students is a decided lack of willingness to find out, but a tremendous effort to believe - in something, anything, and as long as they're never, ever exposed to things outside their beliefs, that's fine.  But that kind of world can only be found in gated communities and desert compounds.  "Security" consists of staying there, forever.  Or changing the world to suit their needs, to everyone else's detriment.

There was a quote that I thought was inspiring for a number of years:  "Most people adapt themselves to the world around them. Occasionally, one person will adapt the world to suit himself.  All progress depends on that one man."

I don't buy that anymore, as I see the Regressive Movement trying to take the country back to a past that didn't really exist.  The world may need shaping, the world definitely needs leaders, but it doesn't need to be leading the way while blindfolded.

And the Texas Board of Education will vote today on just how tight that blindfold it wants to place on our children.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

It Is (To Point) And Laugh: Tornado Of Ideas II


You might have noticed I'm s Star Trek fan.  Mostly TNG, some DS9 and Voyager.  Here's a little morality play.  

Snooty Dr. Bashir tells the resident expat Garak the tale of the Boy Who Cried Wolf - the obvious moral being that when you lie all the time, nobody believes you even when you eventually tell the truth. 

The moral obvious to Garak is "never tell the same lie twice".

My point in relating the tale:  You always find what you're looking for.

So, here are the "lesbians"...


If  you can't see it, the title of the book is "Lost Liberties". 

What else could this picture possibly represent?
Friendship. Family.  Sisterhood.   Comfort.  Commiseration.   I'm sure others could come up with more.


As for the always attention-getting word "sodomy", I'm going to let you judge for yourself.  Click for the entire pic.

Title of the book:  Theives in High Places


I'm going to stand by my initial interpretation.   

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Wahhh-tention seekers kick up dust over Tornado of Ideas

This doesn't even rate being called a dust devil of stupid, but media coverage has been decidedly lopsided.

There's a guy who doesn't like the statue called Tornado of Ideas. That little opinion piece came out in 2007.  Apparently spending years gathering his resources, he started a Facebook group and a real life petition to get the thing removed a week ago.

The reaction on campus and around town is "huh?"  The media reaction is "Tech Conservatives Angered by Statue!" or something similar.  Major news outlets, mostly quoting the press release, talk about the group protesting and having a petition out.

Local news had them on TV.  Great attention, I'll bet.

Here's what you don't read:

1) There's a counter petition and there were counter protests.  Even a couple of counter FaceBook groups.
2) Real life signatures and online membership against the removal outnumber the "angered conservatives" by 10 to 1.

Now to clear some misconceptions about the work:

  • Attempted sodomy depicted.  Since I've actually seen the work, in my opinion it does not depict attempted or actual sodomy.  This is a hot button word being used to get people exited.  I've always seen it as the rider at the end of a chase, pinning down the quarry.  Also, OMG LESBIANS! I'll have to admit I didn't notice this.  I'll check it out and amend as needed.
  • "New" YCT group.  It's been pointed out that the YCT has been around a while, so there's nothing suspicous going on.  As the work has been here since 2004, and the founder of this movement has only been disturbed by it since 2007, and has waited until 2010 to actually do something, I call shenanigans.
  • The sculpture is supposed to represent America.  I have no idea where this got started.  According to Tech,
"Symbolically, the books within the sculpture represent the polarized ideas within the United States that fuel the energy of the tornado, according to the University Public Art Collection."

(see the rest here: http://www.dailytoreador.com/2.13436/controversial-culture-1.1837508)

So there was no nefarious plot to endorse the "liberaly-ness" of anything.
  • B-but-but TAXPAYER MONEEE!  Taxpayer money is used for a lot of things.  It's used for a lot of things I don't agree with, too.  This particular venture of public art started in 1998.  The reason?  To attract outsiders and get them to move here.  And pay taxes and buy stuff.  Business are given tax breaks all the time.  
http://today.ttu.edu/2005/06/communities-use-public-art-to-attract-and-retain-residents-and-businesses/

I wouldn't mind seeing more edifying and inspiring art in the world.  It's great stuff.  I also don't hide from things I don't like.  Listen to your enemies - they have information your friends are keeping from you.

The stated mission of the Tornado of Ideas is to depict the energy created by vigorous debate.  I say: Mission Accomplished.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Computer, what is the nature of the universe?

Defeat has a way of turning your thoughts inward.  Not getting a promotion or job you thought you deserved, a relationship falling through...

...losing an election.

We've been watching the Right engage in the ritual navelgazing that happens after such a thing.  The Democrats did it in 2000, and did it with more vigor in 2004-6.  We've got the TeaB*ggers, we've got the Ron Paul crowd, and we have the old Country Club Republicans looking at it all and saying, "what".

Today's ten dollar phrase "epistemic closure".  It's working its way all over the echo chamber of the left, and we're all talking about and agreeing that We are better than Them because We allow outside thoughts in and They don't.  And They purge whoever isn't Pure enough.

Dr. Crusher: Computer, what is the nature of the universe?
Computer: The universe is a spheroid region, 705 meters in diameter.
-Star Trek: The Next Generation, "Remember Me"
The part of the article that gets the most exposure is the one talking about the Right Wing Bubble and how nothing gets in that doesn't fit the universe.

The part that comes later on, and is expanded later, talks about how the purge really isn't a purge so much as a show put on for the base, or consumers, of the chattering class' product - chatter.  Right now the hot product is how YOU are a REAL AMERICAN™ because YOU haven't SOLD OUT. 

It starts sounding more crazy because people get tired of the same old thing.  So, the "crazies" have to get "crazier".  Discard old, more new.  It's all about the Benjamins, baby.

Now this might make it easy to discard the whole mess as an early "silly season", which usually takes place in August, just before the new products roll out. (we could say it's due to Global Warming and see how folks respond).  People are starting to trim freind lists on FaceBook over that little "joke" of a prayer against the President.  Members of the group gripe that it's only a joke and nobody really means it.  How is one to tell when there really are people in the group posting pictures of people hanging in effigy?

Separating fantasy from reality could get a little more sticky as the early silly season wears on. The Huttaree clan were nicked because they started acting on a false rumor. 

Christian Caryl at Foriegn Policy makes a good case for why we need to start taking conspiracy theories and the "silly" stuff a little more seriously.  That's all well and good, but we're really not going to see the crazy stop until enough of the right people get scared, and start backing away from the "crazy" product producers. 

When the advertisers see there's no market in nuts, they'll pull the plug.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

A new game of chicken

Our Stunt Governor is afraid to debate his opponent.  No surprise.

You can't wink your way out of this one, sir.  Hiding behind a disingenuous request for his tax returns isn't fooling anyone.

Looks like the candidates are nearly in a statistical tie.

So, I'd say if Perry continues to refuse to debate, he'll gain another nickname.  Nominations are open.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Well, this about sums it up



I'm sure it's photoshopped.  (I'm pretty sure that's a verb now).  The original image was taken from an anti-war rally back in the day.

I was in support of those anti-war rallies, and I technically support the TeaB*gger things going on today, because the First Amendment applies to everyone.

Have fun, don't get hurt, try not to do any property damage, and for pete's sake, get someone to spellcheck, eh?

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Government Is A Problem; Government Is A Solution

Not really. Government simply is.  It's a tool that can be used for good or for evil.  Nattering on about "the government" is just talking about yourself, because you, me, and several multi-national corporations are the government.

Kiplinger's has a fine essay on the futility of arguing over "Big Government".
In short, we want the government to be there when we need it, whether it’s to rescue the financial system or to plow snow covered streets. But when government is inefficient and wasteful -- or doing something we don’t believe is wise or critical -- then it’s a different story.
*Source: Kiplinger

The elephant in the room is the multinational coporations, which have been given carte blanche to do what they will in terms of spending on elections.  Supporters to a man say that a corporation is a person, and can't be denied the right to speak.

Well, that all sounds good in theory.  As Dad used to say: "Everything works in theory".

The counter-argument is that it's easier to organize money than it is to organize people.  Who's got the money? The corporations.  It gets you media buys, billboards, flyers, etc.

People gets you people.  They have limited money, limited time, and they aren't usually able to hire out PR agents or bundle bribes contributions to legislators.

Now here's a fun option: Google TV ads could potentially be a leveller.  I wonder if we could have flash ads, like we do flash mobs?

But that's all flash and glitter.  What the people in the country need is information that's correct, that's put together, and that shines a light on what's really going on.  We need to connect the dots.

More on that later.

===========
*Sorry about any rendering or ads, it was required by Kiplinger.

Friday, March 19, 2010

We've been doing this a long, long time

The first self-executing bill was the U.S. Constitution.

Of all the issues that the Anti-Federalists gave for rejecting the new constitution, the lack of a bill of rights was the most compelling for many people. In the ratifying documents of five states, requests or demands for a bill of rights were included in the text, along with suggested lists (see the ratifying documents of Massachusetts, South Carolina, New Hampshire,Virginia, and New York. Rhode Island also included a list, but they ratified the Constitution after the first Congress approved the Bill of Rights).

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Mind the Gap

I got into another Internet Spat this week, 'cause nothing was on TV.  For the most part, we were talking past each other, because the basic reality of the situation was pretty simple.  It got a little silly toward the end, but nearly halfway civil as we finally agreed to disagree.

(Normally I cut off "debate" when the person in question starts calling names, but like I said, there was nothing on TV, and there was some halfway decent argument in the fellow's posts)

Anyway, I got this little gem in my email the other day, "When Debating a Liberal, Start With First Principles", by hardworking Big C Conservative Mark Alexander.  It's a nice little essay on how to slide your way around talking points without having a real conversation.  He's at least honest enough to say that when you're up against another True Beleiver, it's not going to end with agreement, but with a scorched earth, and the only thing that counts is ammunition.

I remember seeing a similar article after the 2006 election.  It was titled "How to talk to a Conservative" or similar, but damned if I can find it now.  It was taken from texts on how to convert former religious folks and smokers.  I found it a smarmy bit of writing and disregareded it. 

eHow.com has a surprisingly good article on simply having a discussion.  Yes! Magazine, who's new to me, has a whole series on talking past the gap.

I've been watching the Coffee Party, which hasn't decided what it'll be when it grows up, but it shows promise.  Guess we'll see.

In other news, Redstate has banned Birthers.  Good move, I think.  Wonder if my Rep knows?